Companies Compliance Facilitation Scheme, 2026 (CCFS-2026) is a one-time compliance amnesty window introduced by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), Government of India, via General Circular No. 01/2026 dated 24-Feb-2026. It is operational from 15 April 2026 to 15 July 2026 and allows defaulting companies to regularise long-pending annual filings — Section 92 annual returns (MGT-7/7A) and Section 137 financial statements (AOC-4) — by paying only 10% of the additional fees otherwise applicable under the Companies Act, 2013. That is an effective 90% waiver on ROC late fees. The scheme also grants reduced fees for dormant status via MSC-1 (50%) and voluntary strike-off via STK-2 (25%), together with conditional immunity from penalty proceedings under Sections 92 and 137, and from Registrar-initiated prosecution. After 15 July 2026, the Registrar is empowered and directed to initiate adjudication, prosecution, director disqualification under Sec 164(2), and strike-off under Sec 248(1) against companies that failed to avail the window.
Virtual Auditor has filed pending ROC returns for 500+ companies. Get a free CCFS-2026 eligibility check in under 10 minutes.
The Companies Compliance Facilitation Scheme, 2026 (CCFS-2026) is a one-time compliance amnesty introduced by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), Government of India, through General Circular No. 01/2026 dated 24 February 2026. It gives companies that have defaulted in filing their statutory annual documents with the Registrar of Companies (ROC) a three-month window — from 15 April 2026 to 15 July 2026 — to regularise those filings by paying only 10% of the additional fees that would otherwise be levied under the Companies Act, 2013. The scheme also offers reduced fees for dormant status conversions, voluntary strike-off, and immunity from penalty adjudication and prosecution under Sections 92 and 137 of the Act.
In practical terms, CCFS-2026 is the single largest reduction in ROC late-filing costs that MCA has announced since CFSS-2020 (the COVID-era scheme). For a private limited company with five years of pending AOC-4 and MGT-7 filings, the difference between filing normally and filing under CCFS-2026 can be several lakhs of rupees — the 90% reduction on additional fees, which typically accrue at Rs 100 per day per form, translates directly into hard cash savings.
CCFS-2026 is also a formal "last chance" signal. The circular explicitly states that after 15 July 2026 the Registrar shall initiate necessary action against companies that remain in default — adjudication under Sec 454, prosecution under Sec 447/448, director disqualification under Sec 164(2), and in extreme cases strike-off of the company's name under Sec 248(1). Companies that have been carrying backlog filings for years should treat CCFS-2026 as a hard deadline.
The scheme covers every class of company registered under the Companies Act, 2013 or its predecessor the Companies Act, 1956 — including private limited companies, public limited companies (unlisted), One Person Companies (OPC), Section 8 non-profits, and producer companies. Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs) are NOT covered — they are governed by the LLP Act, 2008 and have their own settlement schemes when notified.
MCA's stated policy objective in the circular is to facilitate compliance by companies that are genuinely willing to come into compliance but are unable to do so because accumulated late fees have become prohibitive. Over the years, additional fees under Rule 12 of the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014 have accumulated to the point where many small and dormant companies owe more in late fees than they have in working capital. Without an amnesty window, such companies simply cannot afford to file, and end up in a compliance trap that ultimately harms both the MCA database and the companies themselves.
Three business drivers are visible behind the scheme:
The scheme is also an implicit admission that the existing late-fee structure of Rs 100 per day per form, capped at 12 times the normal fee, has become unworkable for companies with multi-year backlogs. CCFS-2026 should be understood as a one-time correction — not a signal that late filing is now acceptable.
CCFS-2026 is a scheme of reduction, not of amendment. The Companies Act, 2013 itself has not been changed. Instead, MCA has used its powers under Section 460 read with Section 403 of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 12 of the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014 to reduce the additional fee for a limited period. The scheme references the following provisions:
Because CCFS-2026 is a circular, not an amendment, its terms can be extended, clarified, or tightened by further MCA circulars at any time during the window. Companies should monitor the MCA website and subscribe to MCA notifications during the scheme period.
The scheme is open to the following classes of companies that have defaulted on statutory filings as of 15 April 2026:
| Class of company | Eligible for | Key conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Private limited company (including OPC) | AOC-4, MGT-7/7A filing, dormant status, strike-off | Must be an active company with pending filings (not struck off) |
| Public limited company (unlisted) | AOC-4, MGT-7 filing, dormant, strike-off (subject to conditions) | Not in default of any securities laws |
| Section 8 company (non-profit) | AOC-4, MGT-7 filing, dormant status | Additional compliance with Sec 8 licence continuation requirements |
| Producer company | AOC-4, MGT-7 filing | Subject to Part IX-A provisions |
| Unlimited company | Annual filings | Must be registered under Companies Act, 2013/1956 |
| Dormant-intent company | MSC-1 application at 50% fee | Must satisfy "inactive company" criteria under Section 455 |
| Voluntary strike-off applicant | STK-2 application at 25% fee | Must be non-operational for at least 2 financial years |
The scheme is automatic on the MCA V3 portal during the scheme window — there is no separate application form or pre-approval required. When a company files AOC-4 or MGT-7 during the window, the portal calculates the additional fee at 10% instead of 100%. Dormant and strike-off applications similarly get the reduced fee applied at upload.
The following situations fall outside the scope of CCFS-2026:
| Action | Normal Fee | Fee Under CCFS-2026 | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pending AOC-4 / MGT-7 | Normal fee + full additional fee (Rs 100/day/form) | Normal fee + 10% of additional fee | ~90% on late fees |
| Dormant status application (MSC-1) | Full prescribed fee (Rs 2,000 – Rs 10,000) | 50% of prescribed fee | 50% |
| Voluntary strike-off (STK-2) | Rs 10,000 filing fee | 25% of filing fee (Rs 2,500) | 75% |
| Penalty under Sec 92 / Sec 137 | Full penalty + adjudication under Sec 454 | Immunity (conditional) | 100% |
| Prosecution under Sec 448 | Possible directors' liability | Not pursued for regularised years | Substantive |
Immunity condition: filings must be made under the scheme either (a) before an adjudicating officer issues a show-cause notice, or (b) within 30 days of such a notice being issued. If either condition is met, no penalty is levied and any in-flight proceedings under Sec 92 or Sec 137 are concluded in the company's favour.
In addition to the headline benefits, CCFS-2026 delivers several secondary advantages:
The math is best understood with real numbers. The examples below use the standard MCA fee table for companies with authorised capital up to Rs 1 crore (most small private limited companies). Fees are illustrative and may vary with capital slab.
Important note: these worked examples exclude professional fees, Digital Signature Certificate (DSC) renewal, audit sign-off, and board / AGM paper preparation, which are separate costs. Virtual Auditor's professional fees for end-to-end CCFS-2026 handling start from Rs 4,999 per pending year for small private companies.
Average turnaround when handled end-to-end by Virtual Auditor: 5–7 working days per pending year, assuming the client provides bank statements and invoices promptly.
For each pending financial year, the following documents are required:
| Document | Purpose | Signed by |
|---|---|---|
| Balance Sheet as at year-end | AOC-4 attachment | Directors & Auditor |
| Statement of Profit & Loss | AOC-4 attachment | Directors & Auditor |
| Cash Flow Statement (if applicable) | AOC-4 attachment | Directors & Auditor |
| Notes to Accounts | AOC-4 attachment | Directors & Auditor |
| Auditor's Report | AOC-4 attachment | Statutory Auditor (CA) |
| Board's Report | AOC-4 attachment | Chairman of the Board |
| Notice of AGM | Evidence of AGM | Company Secretary / Director |
| Minutes of Board Meeting | Adoption of accounts | Chairman |
| Minutes of AGM | Approval of accounts | Chairman of AGM |
| List of Shareholders | MGT-7 attachment | Director / CS |
| List of Directors & KMPs | MGT-7 attachment | Director / CS |
| Register of Members | Supporting record | Company records |
| Active DSC of director | Electronic filing | Director |
| Practising professional certification | MGT-7 attestation (for some companies) | CS / CA / CMA in practice |
One of the most common anxieties around pending annual filings is the risk of director disqualification under Section 164(2) of the Companies Act, 2013. This provision disqualifies a person from being appointed or continuing as a director of any company for a period of five years if the company in which he is a director has:
CCFS-2026 does NOT automatically reverse a Sec 164(2) disqualification that has already triggered. The scheme reduces the fee for the company to catch up on filings, but it does not operate retroactively on the director's personal status. However, completing the pending filings under the scheme is a necessary precondition for the director to seek relief from disqualification, which is typically done by:
Directors who are NOT yet disqualified (i.e., where the three-year continuous default has not yet completed) have the strongest incentive to use CCFS-2026 — it prevents the disqualification from triggering in the first place.
A company that has not been carrying on business or operations for two consecutive financial years, and has not made any significant accounting transactions, can apply to the Registrar for status of a dormant company under Section 455 by filing Form MSC-1. CCFS-2026 reduces the MSC-1 filing fee by 50%. Dormant status relieves the company from filing full annual returns going forward and keeps the company legally alive for future reactivation. Before applying, the company must clear all pending AOC-4 and MGT-7 filings up to the last active year.
A company that has been inactive for at least two financial years and has no outstanding liabilities can apply for voluntary removal of its name from the register under Sec 248(2) by filing Form STK-2. CCFS-2026 reduces the STK-2 filing fee from Rs 10,000 to Rs 2,500. The application must be accompanied by a board resolution, special resolution, statement of accounts certified by a CA (not older than 30 days), and affidavits from directors. Pending annual filings must be cleared before STK-2 can be accepted.
Section 8 companies are eligible for CCFS-2026 fee reductions on AOC-4 and MGT-7 filings. In addition, they should ensure their Section 8 licence remains valid during the scheme period. Section 8 companies that wish to convert to regular company status or surrender their licence must comply with additional procedures under Rule 21 of the Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014, which are not subsumed by CCFS-2026.
Companies admitted into the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) are generally outside the scope of CCFS-2026 for the duration of the moratorium. The resolution professional or liquidator controls corporate actions during this period. Once a resolution plan is approved, the resolved entity may be able to use any remaining scheme window for post-CIRP compliance.
Foreign companies operating in India via branch, liaison, or project offices are required to file Form FC-1, FC-2, FC-3, and FC-4 under Section 380 and 381 of the Companies Act, 2013. CCFS-2026's fee reduction mechanism applies broadly to ROC filings with additional fees — foreign company branches should consult the MCA circular and their professional advisor to confirm specific form coverage.
CCFS-2026 is the latest in a series of ROC amnesty schemes that MCA has issued over the years. Understanding the lineage helps place CCFS-2026 in context:
| Scheme | Window | Fee reduction | Key feature |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLSS-2014 | 15 Aug 2014 – 15 Oct 2014 | 25% additional fee only | First post-Cos-Act-2013 amnesty; narrow window |
| CLSS-2018 | 1 Apr 2018 – 1 May 2018 (extended) | Normal fee only (no additional fee) | Targeted at Sec 164(2) disqualified directors |
| CFSS-2020 | 1 Apr 2020 – 31 Dec 2020 | Normal fee only (no additional fee) | COVID-era broadest amnesty ever; 9-month window |
| LLP Settlement Scheme 2020 | 1 Apr 2020 – 31 Dec 2020 | Normal fee only | LLP-specific; parallel to CFSS-2020 |
| CCFS-2026 (current) | 15 Apr 2026 – 15 Jul 2026 | 10% of additional fee (90% waiver) + immunity | First amnesty since CFSS-2020; bundled with dormant/strike-off incentives |
How CCFS-2026 differs from CFSS-2020: CFSS-2020 provided a complete waiver of the additional fee (100% waiver), which was more generous. CCFS-2026 provides a 90% reduction, not a complete waiver, so there is still a residual cost. However, CCFS-2026 adds the dormant and strike-off fee reductions, which CFSS-2020 did not include. In terms of window length, CFSS-2020 ran for 9 months; CCFS-2026 is compressed to 3 months. Companies should not expect CCFS-2026 to be extended — the narrower window signals MCA's intent to close this as a discrete one-time event.
The MCA circular explicitly states that after the scheme closes, the Registrar shall initiate necessary action against companies that remain in default. The expected enforcement sequence is:
In short, the cost of non-compliance after 15 July 2026 will be significantly higher than the cost of compliance under CCFS-2026. For a 3-year-pending private company, the full penalty + adjudication cost could easily exceed Rs 1 lakh, versus the Rs 5,000–Rs 15,000 under the scheme.
No. CCFS-2026 applies only to companies incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 (and the 1956 Act). LLPs are governed by the LLP Act, 2008 and have their own settlement schemes when notified.
No. Only the additional fee (late fee) is reduced to 10% of what would otherwise apply. The normal prescribed filing fee under the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014 must still be paid in full. The waiver is 90% on additional fees only.
The scheme does not cap the number of years. A company with 5, 7, or even 10 years of pending AOC-4 and MGT-7 filings can regularise all of them during the 15 April to 15 July 2026 window and get the 90% waiver on each year.
The additional fee (which is the "late fee" component) is reduced to 10% of what would normally apply. The normal filing fee is unchanged. Overall, the total savings on a typical AOC-4 or MGT-7 filing is approximately 83 to 90 percent, depending on how late the filing is.
No. Director disqualification is a separate consequence that does not automatically reverse just because pending filings are cleared. However, once the company completes its pending filings under CCFS-2026, the disqualified director can approach the jurisdictional High Court for restoration of DIN, citing compliance completion as a mitigating ground. Some courts have granted relief in such cases.
Yes, as long as adjudication under Sec 92 or Sec 137 has not been concluded. Filing under CCFS-2026 before or within 30 days of a show-cause notice grants immunity, and any in-flight proceeding is concluded without penalty.
No. CFSS-2020 was a 9-month COVID-era scheme with a 100% waiver of additional fees. CCFS-2026 is a 3-month window with a 90% waiver (10% additional fee payable) and adds bundled dormant status and strike-off incentives that CFSS-2020 did not have. The circular, window, and fee structure are all new.
For annual compliance: AOC-4 (or AOC-4 XBRL / AOC-4 CFS, as applicable) for financial statements and MGT-7 or MGT-7A for the annual return, for each defaulting financial year. Companies seeking dormant status file MSC-1. Companies seeking strike-off file STK-2.
The current circular provides a hard stop on 15 July 2026 and explicitly flags enforcement thereafter. Historically, MCA has occasionally extended such schemes by a month or two near the deadline, but no company should plan on an extension. The narrower 3-month window of CCFS-2026 versus the 9-month CFSS-2020 signals MCA intends this as a firm close.
Not directly. A struck-off company must first obtain restoration through an application to the NCLT under Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013. Once restored, it can then regularise its backlog filings and avail CCFS-2026 if the window is still open.
Yes. Immunity is available from prosecution under Section 92 (annual return) and Section 137 (financial statements) for the specific defaults that are regularised under the scheme, provided filings are made before or within 30 days of a show-cause notice. Immunity does not extend to offences under other laws or to cases of fraud.
Virtual Auditor handles end-to-end CCFS-2026 compliance: gap analysis of pending filings, retrospective board and AGM paper preparation, statutory audit sign-off coordination, Form AOC-4 and MGT-7 filing on MCA V3 portal, dormant status and strike-off applications, and responses to adjudication notices. Typical turnaround is 5 to 7 working days per pending year.
Professional fees start from Rs 4,999 per pending year for private limited companies with routine backlogs. The exact fee depends on the number of pending years, complexity of the audit, whether dormant or strike-off is needed, and whether there are adjudication notices to respond to. Request a free eligibility check on WhatsApp +91 99622 60333 for a firm quote.
No. DIR-3 KYC is a director-level compliance under Rule 12A of the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014, not a company-level filing. It is not covered by CCFS-2026 fee reductions. However, directors should file DIR-3 KYC before the annual return, because some form workflows on V3 are blocked otherwise.
Generally no, during the period of CIRP moratorium. The resolution professional controls the company and CCFS-2026 filings are not within the moratorium carve-outs. Once a resolution plan is approved, the resolved entity may use any remaining scheme window.
A full-time company secretary is mandatory only for companies whose paid-up capital is above the specified threshold or which are listed. For smaller private companies, a practising company secretary or chartered accountant can certify the annual return. However, having a professional review the filings before upload is highly recommended.
No. Strike-off years cannot be filed retrospectively. After NCLT restoration under Section 252, the company can file for years up to the date of striking off and then for post-restoration years.
No. CCFS-2026 is strictly an MCA / Companies Act compliance scheme. It does not touch GST late fees, income tax penalties, or any other tax or regulatory compliance. Those have their own amnesty schemes from time to time.
Log in to the MCA V3 portal, go to MCA Services, and check the "View Public Documents" or "Master Data" for the company. The list of filed annual returns and financial statements shows which years are filed and which are pending. Alternatively, use Virtual Auditor\u2019s free gap analysis tool.
Foreign company branch offices file under Section 380/381 of the Companies Act and have separate forms (FC-1 to FC-4). CCFS-2026\u2019s fee reduction mechanism applies broadly to ROC filings that attract additional fees. Branch offices should consult the circular and their professional advisor for form-specific confirmation.
If a compounding application has already been filed under Section 441 of the Companies Act, 2013 before CCFS-2026 came into effect, the company may be able to withdraw it and use the CCFS-2026 immunity instead, provided the compounding order has not been concluded. Consult a professional for specific situations.
Yes. CCFS-2026 grants immunity only for defaults under Sections 92 and 137 (pending annual return and financial statement filings). It does not cover other offences such as fraud under Section 447, offences involving misstatements, or offences under other laws such as SEBI regulations, PMLA, or the Income-tax Act.
The scheme is a window from 15 April 2026 to 15 July 2026 — approximately 91 calendar days. There is no minimum notice period required to use it; a company can start filing on the first day. Maximum is the closing date of 15 July 2026.
No. There is no separate "CCFS-2026 application fee". The scheme is automatic: when you file an eligible form during the window, the MCA V3 portal calculates the additional fee at the reduced rate automatically. The only fees you pay are the normal filing fee plus the 10% additional fee.
Using CCFS-2026 is a positive compliance signal, not a negative one. Credit rating agencies and lenders view compliance rectification favourably. In contrast, remaining in default of ROC filings is considered a negative factor and can trigger a downgrade. Companies should view CCFS-2026 as an opportunity to improve their compliance profile.
Yes, absolutely. A company with no business activity still has the legal obligation to file AOC-4 and MGT-7 each year unless it has obtained dormant status or has been struck off. Using CCFS-2026 is the cheapest way to either (a) clear the backlog and then take dormant status via MSC-1, or (b) clear the backlog and then voluntarily strike off via STK-2. Both paths benefit from the scheme\u2019s reduced fees.
CA V. Viswanathan, FCA, ACS, CFE, IBBI Registered Valuer: In my fifteen years of CA practice, I have seen several amnesty schemes come and go, and my single strongest message to every founder and director facing backlog ROC compliance is this: take CCFS-2026 seriously and act in the first month of the window, not the last. Three patterns repeat every time MCA opens a scheme. First, founders underestimate the complexity of retrospective AGM and audit paperwork — they assume the filing is a one-day activity and then discover that getting the auditor to sign five years of financial statements takes longer than the scheme allows if they start in June. Second, founders assume the V3 portal will be fast in the last week — it will not be. In the final seven days of every amnesty window I have handled, the portal slows dramatically and rejection rates go up because of system load. Third, and most importantly, founders with Sec 164(2) disqualification triggers close to three years underestimate how much leverage CCFS-2026 gives them to prevent the disqualification from triggering at all. A company with two years and eleven months of non-filing can file both pending years on 20 April 2026 and walk away without ever crossing the three-year threshold. That is a director career-saving outcome that costs less than Rs 15,000 in MCA fees. My firm is already running CCFS-2026 filings for clients, and my advice is simple: treat the scheme as your one-time opportunity to clean the slate, plan documentation in the last week of March, audit sign-offs in the first week of April, and upload the backlog in the second and third week of April. Do not wait. Do not gamble on an extension. The 91 days will go faster than you expect, and the penalty architecture waiting on 16 July is far worse than any late-fee number you are currently looking at.
Free CCFS-2026 eligibility check. No obligation. Answer in under 10 minutes on WhatsApp. Virtual Auditor has filed pending ROC returns for 500+ companies.
Source: MCA General Circular No. 01/2026 dated 24 February 2026. Last updated: 30 April 2026.
Related guides: Income-tax Act, 2025 Complete Guide · Annual ROC Filing — AOC-4 and MGT-7 · Presumptive Taxation · Corporate Tax Rates 2026-27 · Startup Taxation