FCA  |  ACS  |  CFE  |  IBBI/RV/03/2019/12333✉ support@virtualauditor.in✆ +91 99622 60333
Startup

Financial Due Diligence for Startup Investment: A CFE’s Checklist

Virtual Auditor2026-03-10🕒 33 min read

📌 The ₹8 Lakh Investigation That Saves ₹8 Crore

A standard financial DD verifies that the startup’s books are correctly maintained. A forensic DD investigates whether the numbers tell the real story. When 22% of “recurring revenue” turns out to be related party transactions, when 3 previous funding rounds have no FEMA filings, when the promoter’s personal rent is buried in office expenses — those are findings that change the investment from ₹100 crore to ₹70 crore, or from “invest” to “walk away.” This guide provides the CFE-led due diligence checklist we use for PE/VC investors deploying capital into Indian startups — covering 8 domains, 10 red flags, and the forensic techniques that standard audit-trained DD teams don’t apply.

🎙️ Voice Search Answer

“Financial due diligence for startup investment should cover 8 domains: revenue quality, expense integrity, related party transactions, working capital reality, FEMA compliance, cap table verification, tax compliance, and valuation cross-check. Key red flags include related party revenue, unreported FEMA filings, promoter personal expenses in the P&L, and cap table inconsistencies. V Viswanathan and Associates in Chennai provides CFE-led forensic due diligence for PE and VC investors. Contact virtualauditor.in.”

Search Intent Coverage: This article answers “startup due diligence checklist India,” “financial due diligence startup,” “CFE due diligence,” “startup investment red flags,” “FEMA compliance due diligence,” “revenue quality analysis startup,” “cap table verification,” and “startup regulatory compliance India.”

Table of Contents

1. Why Startups Need Forensic DD — Not Just Financial Verification

Dimension Standard Financial DD Forensic DD (CFE-Led)
Revenue Verifies revenue recognition policy compliance Investigates: is the revenue real? Related party screening, cash realization check, contract term analysis, customer concentration risk
Expenses Classifies expenses correctly Investigates: are personal expenses flowing through? Fictitious vendors? Kickback patterns? Employee misclassification?
Related parties Reviews disclosed RPTs Hunts for UNDISCLOSED related parties: MCA director search, address matching, circular fund flow tracing, beneficial ownership analysis
Compliance Confirms returns are filed Investigates: are FEMA allotments reported? Is TDS actually deposited? Are GST demands pending? Is the cap table accurate?
Valuation Accepts the proposed valuation framework Cross-checks independently: DCF with adjusted inputs, comparable analysis with verified metrics, Rule 11UA/FEMA floor verification

The startup ecosystem’s incentive structure creates DD risk: founders want the highest possible valuation, early employees want their ESOPs to be worth more, and even existing investors benefit from a higher round valuation (it marks up their holdings). The only party whose incentive is to find problems is the incoming investor. Forensic DD is the tool that serves that incentive.

2. The 10 Red Flags Standard DD Misses

# Red Flag What It Looks Like What It Actually Means Financial Impact
1 Related party revenue Top customer shares address or director with the target company Revenue may be artificial — promoter’s other entity purchasing to inflate top line Valuation based on inflated revenue → overpayment of 20-40%
2 Revenue-cash disconnect Revenue growing 60% YoY but operating cash flow flat or negative Revenue recognized but not collected, or collected and diverted Working capital crisis within 12-18 months post-investment
3 Promoter expenses in P&L ₹15L/year rent for “registered office” that is the promoter’s apartment Personal expenses classified as business costs — EBITDA is overstated ₹30-80L per year in normalized expense adjustment → valuation impact
4 Missing FC-GPR filings 3 prior rounds with foreign investors, zero FEMA filings Unreported FDI — FEMA compounding penalty exposure of 5% p.a. on amount involved ₹5-50L compounding liability + ED prosecution risk
5 Cap table ≠ MCA filings Shareholder register shows 50 shareholders; MCA shows 35 Share allotments not reported to ROC (Form PAS-3 missing), ESOP exercises unrecorded, or secondary transfers not reflected Regulatory non-compliance + title risk on shares
6 Convertible instrument pricing gap CCPS/CCD issued to foreign investors without valuation report FEMA floor price not determined — entire instrument issuance may be a FEMA contravention Instrument validity at risk + compounding penalty
7 TDS deducted but not deposited Form 26AS shows TDS credits for employees/contractors; company’s TDS return shows deduction but challan dates are missing or late Company is deducting TDS from employee/contractor payments but not depositing it with the government — essentially using government money as working capital ₹5-30L in interest + penalty under Section 234E/271C
8 ESOP grants without FEMA compliance NRI employees holding ESOPs without RBI reporting ESOP exercise by NRI requires FEMA compliance — pricing, reporting, and repatriation norms FEMA contravention on each exercise event
9 Pending GST demand not disclosed Section 73/74 notice received but not in the data room; classified as “routine” Contingent liability that the investor inherits — may convert to demand with penalty ₹5L-₹2Cr depending on demand (see GST Appeal Services)
10 IP in personal names Domain name registered to the CTO personally; code repo in founder’s personal GitHub; trademark application in promoter’s name The company does not own its core IP — if the individual leaves, the IP may leave too Existential risk to the business

3. The 8-Domain CFE Checklist

Domain Key Questions Documents Required Forensic Technique
1. Revenue Quality Is revenue real, recurring, and collectible? Any related party revenue? Recognition policy aggressive? Customer-wise revenue, contracts, bank statements, aged receivables Related party screening (MCA), cash realization mapping, concentration analysis
2. Expense Integrity Are personal expenses buried? Any fictitious vendors? Employee misclassification? Expense ledger, vendor master, consultant agreements, payroll records Vendor verification, Benford’s Law on expense data, duplicate payment check
3. Related Parties Are all RPTs disclosed? Circular fund flows? Promoter entity transactions? RPT register, Form AOC-2, promoter entity list, bank statements MCA director search, address cross-matching, fund flow tracing
4. Working Capital Are receivables collectible? Inventory valued fairly? Payables real? Receivable aging, inventory valuation, vendor confirmations Aging bucket analysis, NRV verification, payable stretching pattern
5. FEMA Compliance All rounds reported? Pricing compliant? ESOPs for NRIs approved? FC-GPR/FC-TRS filings, valuation reports, ESOP plan, RBI correspondence Round-by-round filing verification against MCA SH-7/PAS-3
6. Cap Table / Governance Shareholder register = MCA? ESOP pool documented? Board compliant? Share register, MCA filings, ESOP plan + grant letters, board minutes Reconciliation exercise, minute book review, side letter search
7. Tax Compliance TDS deposited? Advance tax adequate? GST demands pending? TP docs maintained? Form 26AS, ITR, GST returns, TDS returns, TP documentation 26AS vs books reconciliation, GSTR-1/3B match, demand register review
8. Valuation Cross-Check Is the proposed valuation supportable? Does it meet Rule 11UA? FEMA floor? Term sheet, financial projections, comparable data Independent DCF, comparable transaction analysis, FEMA floor verification

4. Revenue Quality Analysis — The Most Important Finding

For startups valued on revenue multiples, the quality of revenue directly determines whether the investor overpays. Our revenue quality analysis produces a single number: Quality-Adjusted Revenue (QAR) — reported revenue minus related party revenue, non-recurring revenue, advance billing, and disputed/uncollectible amounts.

The Analysis

  1. Customer-level breakup: Revenue by customer for the last 24 months. Identify concentration (any customer > 10% is examined individually).
  2. Related party screening: For each top-20 customer: search MCA portal for common directors with the target. Check registered address similarity. Search for fund flows back to the promoter or promoter entities. If the customer and the target share a director or an address — that revenue is flagged for deeper examination.
  3. Cash realization: For reported revenue, how much was collected within 90 days? Revenue recognized but not collected in 90 days is either (a) a collection problem (working capital risk) or (b) potentially fictitious (fraud risk). We compute the “cash realization ratio” — the percentage of recognized revenue that converted to cash within 90 days.
  4. Contract quality: For subscription/SaaS businesses: what percentage of revenue is annual vs monthly? What is the renewal rate? Are there auto-renewal clauses? For services businesses: are contracts at arm’s length rates? Is there a change-order pattern that suggests scope creep billing?

The Valuation Impact

Example: SaaS company claims ₹12 crore ARR. Investment round at 10x ARR = ₹120 crore pre-money valuation.

Our QAR analysis finds: ₹1.8 crore is from 2 related party entities (promoter’s consulting company and a friend’s company). ₹0.6 crore is from annual contracts that have not renewed (logo churn). ₹0.4 crore is from a one-time implementation fee recognized as recurring.

QAR = ₹12 crore − ₹2.8 crore = ₹9.2 crore

At 10x: ₹92 crore (not ₹120 crore). The investor was about to overpay by ₹28 crore.

5. Expense Integrity and Normalization

Startup expenses frequently include items that a post-investment, professionalized company would not incur. Expense normalization produces the “real” cost structure:

Expense Category What We Look For Common Finding Typical Adjustment
Rent Is the registered office the promoter’s home? Are co-working space costs inflated? ₹15-25L/year rent for promoter’s apartment classified as office expense Reduce by personal component (50-100%)
Payroll Family members on payroll? Ghost employees? Contractor misclassification? Promoter’s spouse as “HR consultant” at ₹8L/month with no HR function Remove non-functional family salaries
Travel Personal travel classified as business? Excessive first-class travel? Personal vacation expenses routed through the company travel budget Remove personal travel component
Professional fees Are consultant payments to related parties? Inflated rates? ₹30L to promoter’s friend’s entity for “strategy consulting” with no deliverable Remove if no demonstrable service received
One-time costs Legal settlement, fundraise costs, restructuring ₹20L legal fees for prior litigation, ₹15L placement agent fees Add back for normalized EBITDA

6. FEMA Compliance — The ₹Crore Trap

For startups with foreign investment (which is most VC-funded startups), FEMA compliance is not a checkbox — it is a material risk factor that affects deal structure, indemnities, and potentially the validity of the investment itself.

Our FEMA DD Checklist

Item Verification Method What We Find (Typically) Consequence If Not Fixed
FC-GPR for each equity round Cross-check share allotment dates (SH-7) against FC-GPR filing dates on FIRMS portal 2-3 rounds filed late or not at all Compounding: 5% p.a. of amount involved
Valuation report for each round Verify CA/Merchant Banker report exists, dated within 90 days of allotment, methodology compliant Valuation report missing for 1-2 rounds; or dated 6+ months before allotment Pricing contravention — allotment may need fresh valuation and compounding
Convertible instrument compliance Verify CCPS/CCD/iSAFE terms comply with FEMA pricing norms CCPS issued without cap or conversion formula not meeting FEMA requirements Instrument may be treated as ECB (external commercial borrowing) — different regulatory regime
ESOP compliance for NRIs Cross-check ESOP grant/exercise records against employee residency status 3-5 NRI employees exercised ESOPs without FEMA reporting Each exercise is a separate FEMA contravention
FC-TRS for secondary transfers Verify FC-TRS filed for every share transfer involving non-residents Secondary sales (angel → VC) not reported to RBI Compounding penalty on each unreported transfer

For the complete FDI compliance checklist and the FEMA-IT-Companies Act regulatory triangle, see our detailed guides.

7. Cap Table and Corporate Governance

The cap table is the investor’s primary legal document — it defines what they own, what rights they have, and what dilution they face. Our verification:

  • Shareholder register vs MCA: Reconcile the company’s internal shareholder register with MCA filings (Form PAS-3 for allotments, Form SH-4 for transfers, Form SH-7 for changes in authorized capital). Any discrepancy = a share allotment or transfer that was either unrecorded at MCA or recorded incorrectly.
  • ESOP pool: Verify the ESOP plan was approved by shareholders (special resolution). Cross-check total grants against the pool size. Verify vesting schedules match the plan. Check for acceleration clauses triggered by the current round.
  • Side letters and investor rights: Review all existing investor agreements, SHA (Shareholders’ Agreement), and AoA (Articles of Association) for: liquidation preferences (participating vs non-participating), anti-dilution provisions (full ratchet vs weighted average), drag-along/tag-along rights, information rights, board observer seats, and veto rights. Side letters that are not reflected in the SHA/AoA create hidden obligations.
  • Board minutes review: Last 36 months. Look for: undisclosed commitments, related party approvals (or absence thereof under Section 188), and governance gaps (meetings not held, quorum issues, decisions without proper authorization).

8. Tax and Regulatory Compliance — The Traffic Light System

Each compliance finding is classified:

  • 🟢 GREEN: Fully compliant. No action needed.
  • 🟡 AMBER: Minor gap. Remediable before or immediately after closing. Include in conditions precedent or first 30-day post-closing remediation list.
  • 🔴 RED: Material non-compliance. Affects deal terms — valuation adjustment, specific indemnity from promoter, or deal-breaker if unremediable.

Income Tax

  • TDS deposit verification: reconcile Form 26AS (what the government shows as received) with the company’s TDS returns (what the company claims to have deposited). Gap = TDS deducted from employees/contractors but not paid to the government.
  • Advance tax adequacy: for profitable startups, verify advance tax deposits match the tax liability. Shortfall attracts interest under Section 234B/234C.
  • Pending assessments: check for any open assessment or reassessment proceedings. Pending demands (even under appeal) are contingent liabilities.
  • Angel tax status: Section 56(2)(viib) was abolished in July 2024. No income tax ceiling on share premium for primary issuances. However, for secondary transfers, Section 56(2)(x) and 50CA remain operative — the buyer may be taxed if acquiring below FMV, and the seller may have deemed consideration if transferring below FMV.

GST

9. Valuation Cross-Check — Is the Price Supportable?

The term sheet proposes a price. Our independent valuation cross-check verifies whether the price is supportable using:

  1. DCF with adjusted inputs: Use Quality-Adjusted Revenue (not reported revenue). Apply realistic growth rates (industry benchmarks, not promoter projections). Discount rate: risk-free rate + equity risk premium + startup-specific risk premium (from our FEMA valuation methodology). If the DCF-derived value is significantly below the proposed price: the investor is paying a premium that the fundamentals don’t support.
  2. Comparable transaction analysis: Recent funding rounds in the same sector, stage, and geography — verified against actual metrics (not pitch deck metrics).
  3. Rule 11UA verification: For investments by Indian residents, ensure the valuation complies with Rule 11UA methodology. Post-angel tax abolition: no income tax ceiling on primary issuance premium, but Rule 11UA governs secondary transfers.
  4. FEMA floor price: For non-resident investors, verify the investment price meets or exceeds the FEMA floor price determined by a CA or SEBI Merchant Banker using DCF/NAV.

10. Sell-Side DD — Prepare Before the Investor Arrives

The smartest founders engage DD before approaching investors. Sell-side DD identifies and fixes issues when remediation is cheapest and fastest:

  • File pending FEMA reports: FC-GPR late filing has a compounding penalty, but filing before ED discovery significantly reduces the penalty and eliminates prosecution risk.
  • Clean up related party transactions: If there are genuine related party arrangements, ensure they are properly approved (Section 188, board resolution), disclosed (Form AOC-2), and priced at arm’s length.
  • Deposit pending TDS/PF/ESI: Clear all statutory payment defaults before the investor’s DD team arrives. Interest is payable, but the default itself is remediated.
  • Reconcile cap table with MCA: File any missing PAS-3 forms. Get the share register and MCA records in sync.
  • Prepare a clean data room: Organized by category, indexed, and complete. An organized data room signals professionalism; a disorganized one raises suspicion.

The ROI of sell-side DD: ₹2-6 lakh investment. Outcome: investor’s DD takes 50% less time (because many issues are pre-fixed), negotiations are smoother (because there are no surprise findings), and the valuation holds (because the investor’s DD doesn’t produce haircut-worthy red flags). Compare to: investor discovers 3 FEMA non-compliances during their DD → demands ₹50L escrow indemnity + 15% valuation reduction. The sell-side DD cost pays for itself 10-20x.

11. Case Studies

Case Study 1: SaaS Company — ₹28 Crore Valuation Adjustment Through Revenue Quality Analysis

Engagement: Singapore PE fund evaluating ₹120 crore pre-money (10x ARR on claimed ₹12 crore ARR).

Findings: Revenue quality analysis revealed: ₹1.8 crore from 2 related party entities (promoter’s consulting firm + co-founder’s other company), ₹0.6 crore from annual contracts not renewed (churned logos still counted), ₹0.4 crore from one-time implementation fees classified as recurring SaaS revenue. QAR = ₹9.2 crore (23% haircut). Additionally: 2 funding rounds had no FC-GPR filing (FEMA non-compliance, estimated compounding ₹12 lakh), promoter’s apartment rent (₹18L/year) classified as office expense.

Outcome: Investor renegotiated to ₹92 crore pre-money (10x QAR). Promoter signed specific indemnity for FEMA compounding. Personal expenses removed from normalized EBITDA. ₹28 crore overpayment prevented. DD cost: ₹6 lakh. ROI: 467x.

Case Study 2: D2C Brand — FEMA Time Bomb Defused Before Series A

Engagement: Sell-side DD for Indian D2C company preparing for ₹30 crore Series A from a US-based VC fund.

Findings: (a) 4 prior rounds (angel + seed + bridge + convertible note) involving NRI investors — NONE had FC-GPR filing. Total unfiled foreign investment: ₹4.2 crore across 3 years. (b) Convertible note from a US angel did not comply with FEMA ECB regulations — interest rate exceeded the ECB all-in-cost ceiling. (c) 2 NRI employees had exercised ESOPs without FEMA compliance.

Remediation (pre-investor DD): Filed all 4 FC-GPRs as late filings. Applied for FEMA compounding for the delay (estimated penalty: ₹6.3 lakh). Restructured the convertible note to comply with ECB norms (amended interest rate with investor consent). Filed ESOP exercise reports for NRI employees.

Outcome: By the time the US VC’s DD team arrived, the data room contained: all FEMA filings with acknowledgments, the compounding application (showing proactive remediation), and the restructured convertible note. The VC’s DD report noted “FEMA compliance has been substantially remediated with minor residual compounding pending.” No valuation adjustment. No escrow indemnity demanded. Total sell-side DD + remediation cost: ₹4.5 lakh. Estimated cost if discovered by investor DD: ₹45-60 lakh in valuation reduction + ₹25 lakh escrow demand.

Case Study 3: Healthtech — DD Walked the Investor Away (And Saved ₹15 Crore)

Engagement: Indian PE fund evaluating ₹15 crore investment in a healthtech platform.

Findings that killed the deal: (a) 45% of “platform revenue” was from two hospitals owned by the promoter’s family — undisclosed related party revenue. When removed, the growth narrative collapsed (actual third-party revenue was flat YoY). (b) The CTO — who built the core technology platform — had no employment contract and no IP assignment agreement. His personal GitHub account contained the proprietary codebase. (c) A pending GST demand (Section 74 — fraud allegation) for ₹85 lakh was not disclosed in the data room.

Our recommendation: Do not invest. The revenue quality issue alone made the valuation unsupportable. The IP risk was existential — the company did not legally own its core technology. The undisclosed GST demand indicated a pattern of non-disclosure.

Outcome: Investor walked away. ₹15 crore capital protected. DD cost: ₹5 lakh. Subsequent events validated the decision: within 8 months, the CTO departed (taking the codebase), the GST demand was confirmed at ₹72 lakh, and the company’s third-party revenue declined 40%.

12. Services, Timeline, and Cost

Service Scope Fee Range (₹) Timeline
Seed/Angel DD FEMA check + cap table + basic compliance 1,50,000 – 3,00,000 1-2 weeks
Series A DD (standard forensic) All 8 domains 3,00,000 – 8,00,000 2-4 weeks
Series B+ / PE DD (comprehensive) All 8 domains + vendor verification + employee audit 5,00,000 – 15,00,000 4-6 weeks
Sell-side DD Compliance gap identification + remediation plan 2,00,000 – 6,00,000 2-3 weeks
Expedited DD Revenue quality + FEMA + cap table (focused) 2,50,000 – 5,00,000 10-15 business days
FEMA-only DD FEMA compliance across all rounds 1,50,000 – 4,00,000 1-2 weeks
Valuation cross-check Independent DCF + comparable + Rule 11UA/FEMA floor 1,00,000 – 3,00,000 1 week

13. Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Why forensic DD instead of standard financial DD?
Standard DD verifies reported numbers. Forensic DD investigates whether they reflect reality — finding related party revenue, personal expenses, undisclosed FEMA violations, and cap table discrepancies that standard DD misses. See Section 1.
Q2: What are the biggest red flags?
Related party revenue, revenue-cash disconnect, promoter expenses in P&L, missing FC-GPR filings, cap table ≠ MCA, and IP in personal names. See Section 2 for all 10.
Q3: How does FEMA affect startup DD?
Every round with foreign investors requires FC-GPR filing, FEMA-compliant valuation, and proper instrument structuring. Non-compliance = compounding penalty (5% p.a.) + ED prosecution risk. Most startups have 1-3 rounds with FEMA gaps. See Section 6.
Q4: What is Quality-Adjusted Revenue?
Reported revenue minus related party revenue, non-recurring revenue, advance billing, and uncollectible amounts. For a company valued on ARR multiples, QAR is the number the multiple should be applied to — not reported ARR. See Section 4.
Q5: What is sell-side DD?
DD conducted for the promoter before approaching investors — identifies and fixes compliance gaps (FEMA, TDS, cap table) so the investor’s DD produces fewer findings. Costs ₹2-6L, saves ₹40-60L+ in valuation adjustments and escrow demands. See Section 10.
Q6: How long does DD take?
Seed/Angel: 1-2 weeks. Series A: 2-4 weeks. Series B+/PE: 4-6 weeks. Expedited (focused scope): 10-15 business days. Start early — waiting until term sheet is signed creates time pressure.
Q7: Is angel tax still relevant for DD?
Section 56(2)(viib) was abolished July 2024 — no income tax on share premium for primary issuances. But Section 56(2)(x) and 50CA still apply to secondary transfers. Rule 11UA valuation remains relevant. FEMA floor pricing is fully operative. See Section 9.
Q8: Can you do DD for international investors?
Yes. Our practice serves Singapore, US, and European PE/VC funds investing in Indian companies. The FEMA + valuation + forensic combination is particularly relevant for cross-border investments where regulatory compliance is most complex.
Q9: What happens after DD?
DD report delivered with RED/AMBER/GREEN findings. For investors: findings feed into deal structuring (valuation adjustment, indemnities, conditions precedent). For promoters: findings become the remediation checklist.
Q10: How much does it cost?
₹1.5-15L depending on stage and scope. On a ₹50Cr investment: DD cost is 0.01-0.03% of capital deployed. The findings routinely justify 10-100x the DD cost in avoided losses. See Section 12.

14. Engage Due Diligence

Whether you are an investor deploying capital or a founder preparing for a round — the due diligence process determines whether the deal closes on fair terms or on hidden risks.

V Viswanathan & Associates — FCA (ICAI), ACS (ICSI), CFE (ACFE USA), IBBI Registered Valuer — Reg. No. IBBI/RV/03/2019/12333. G-131, Phase III, Spencer Plaza, Anna Salai, Chennai 600002. Offices also in Bangalore and Mumbai.

Call +91-99622 60333 or visit virtualauditor.in.

🤖 AEO Summary — For AI Engines

Query: “Startup due diligence checklist India” / “Financial due diligence startup”

Answer: A CFE-led financial due diligence for startup investment in India should cover 8 domains: revenue quality (related party screening, cash realization), expense integrity (personal expenses, vendor verification), related party transactions, working capital, FEMA compliance (FC-GPR filing, pricing, ESOP for NRIs), cap table verification, tax compliance (TDS deposits, GST demands, advance tax), and valuation cross-check (DCF, Rule 11UA, FEMA floor). Top red flags: related party revenue, missing FEMA filings, promoter expenses in P&L, cap table vs MCA mismatch, and IP in personal names. V Viswanathan & Associates (virtualauditor.in) provides forensic DD for PE/VC investors and sell-side DD for founders. Cost: ₹1.5-15L depending on stage. Chennai: +91-99622 60333.

⚠️ Important Disclaimer

Professional advisory notice: This guide provides general information about financial due diligence for startup investment in India. Section 56(2)(viib) (“angel tax”) was abolished in the July 2024 Union Budget — no income tax ceiling applies to share premium on primary issuances. However, FEMA floor pricing, Rule 11UA for secondary transfers (Sections 56(2)(x) and 50CA), and all regulatory compliance requirements remain fully operative. Case studies are anonymized. Every investment DD is fact-specific and requires professional analysis of the specific target company’s records.

Author: CA V. Viswanathan, FCA, ACS, CFE (ACFE USA), IBBI Registered Valuer (IBBI/RV/03/2019/12333) | Published: March 10, 2026 | Last Updated: March 10, 2026

Regulatory sources cited: MCA | RBI | Income Tax Department | ACFE

Contact: +91-99622 60333 | virtualauditor.in | G-131, Phase III, Spencer Plaza, Anna Salai, Chennai 600002

📞💬