Secretarial Audit: Section 204 Applicability & MR-3 Report

1. Legislative Framework for Secretarial Audit

The concept of a mandatory secretarial audit was introduced for the first time through the Companies Act, 2013. Prior to this, secretarial audits were voluntary and conducted primarily based on recommendations of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India (ICSI). The principal statutory provisions governing secretarial audit include:

• Section 204 of the Companies Act, 2013 — Mandates secretarial audit for prescribed class of companies
• Rule 9 of the Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014 — Prescribes the class of companies subject to secretarial audit
• Form MR-3 — Prescribed format for the Secretarial Audit Report
• Regulation 24A of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 — Extends secretarial audit requirements for listed entities and their material unlisted subsidiaries
• Secretarial Standards SS-1 & SS-2 — Issued by ICSI and mandated under Section 118(10)
• ICSI Guidance Notes on Secretarial Audit — Providing detailed procedural guidance

The secretarial audit is distinct from the statutory financial audit conducted under Section 143 and the cost audit under Section 148. It is a governance-focused audit that examines the company’s compliance ecosystem holistically, complementing the work of company secretarial professionals who manage day-to-day compliance.

2. Applicability of Secretarial Audit Under Section 204

Section 204(1) mandates secretarial audit for every listed company and for every company belonging to such other class of companies as may be prescribed. Rule 9 of the Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014, prescribes the following classes:

2.1 SEBI LODR Extension

Under Regulation 24A of the SEBI LODR Regulations, the following entities are also required to obtain an Annual Secretarial Compliance Report:

• Every listed entity
• Every material unlisted subsidiary of a listed entity (incorporated in India)

The Annual Secretarial Compliance Report is issued by a PCS in a format specified by SEBI and is filed with the stock exchanges. This is in addition to the Form MR-3 report annexed to the Board’s Report.

3. Appointment of the Secretarial Auditor

The secretarial auditor must be a Company Secretary in Practice (PCS) — that is, a member of the ICSI holding a Certificate of Practice. The appointment is made by the Board of Directors by passing a board resolution. Key aspects of the appointment process include:

• The Board must ensure that the PCS appointed is independent and does not have any conflict of interest
• The appointment should ideally be made at the beginning of the financial year to enable the PCS to conduct the audit concurrently
• The terms of engagement, including the scope, fees, and timeline, should be documented in an engagement letter
• The secretarial auditor has a right of access to all books, papers, minutes, and documents of the company, as provided under Section 204(2)

3.1 Duty to Assist the Secretarial Auditor

Section 204(3) imposes a duty on the company and its officers to provide all assistance and facilities to the secretarial auditor. If the company or any officer fails to provide the required access or information, the PCS is required to report such limitations in the MR-3 report as a qualification or observation.

3.2 Peer Review

The ICSI has introduced a Peer Review framework for practising Company Secretaries issuing secretarial audit reports. Under the ICSI Peer Review Guidelines, PCS firms conducting secretarial audits of listed companies and prescribed class of companies are subject to periodic peer review to ensure quality and consistency in reporting.

4. Scope of Secretarial Audit

The scope of the secretarial audit is extensive and covers the company’s compliance with multiple laws and governance frameworks. The key areas examined include:

4.1 Companies Act, 2013 & Rules

• Board constitution, composition, and committee structures (Audit Committee, Nomination & Remuneration Committee, Stakeholders’ Relationship Committee, CSR Committee)
• Board meetings — notice, quorum, agenda, attendance, minutes, and compliance with Secretarial Standard SS-1
• General meetings — notice, explanatory statement, quorum, voting, poll, postal ballot, and compliance with Secretarial Standard SS-2
• Director appointments, resignations, disqualifications, remuneration, and disclosures
• Related party transactions under Section 188 and Rules
• Share capital changes — allotment, transfer, transmission, buy-back, reduction
• Loans, investments, and guarantees under Section 185 and Section 186
• Statutory registers and records maintenance
• Annual filing — annual return (MGT-7/MGT-7A), financial statements (AOC-4), and other forms

4.2 Securities Laws (for Listed Companies)

• SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015 — continuous disclosure, corporate governance, related party transactions
• SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015 — code of conduct, trading window closures, disclosures
• SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011
• SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2018
• SEBI (Share Based Employee Benefits and Sweat Equity) Regulations, 2021
• SEBI (Depositories and Participants) Regulations, 2018

4.3 Secretarial Standards

Compliance with Secretarial Standards issued by the ICSI is mandatory under Section 118(10) of the Companies Act, 2013. The two operative secretarial standards are:

• SS-1 (Secretarial Standard on Meetings of the Board of Directors) — Covers notice period, agenda, quorum, participation through electronic mode, minutes preparation and signing, passing of resolutions by circulation, and committee meetings
• SS-2 (Secretarial Standard on General Meetings) — Covers notice, explanatory statement, quorum, proxies, show of hands and poll, postal ballot, minutes, and registered office requirements for AGMs

The secretarial auditor must verify whether the company has complied with the applicable provisions of SS-1 and SS-2 and report any deviations in the MR-3 report.

4.4 Other Applicable Laws

The secretarial audit also covers compliance with other laws specifically applicable to the company based on its industry, such as:

• Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) and RBI regulations
• Environmental laws and pollution control regulations
• Labour laws and industrial regulations
• Industry-specific regulations (banking, insurance, telecom, etc.)
• Competition Act, 2002
• Tax laws to the extent affecting governance and compliance status

4.5 Related Party Transactions

A significant component of the secretarial audit is the examination of related party transactions under Section 188 and (for listed companies) Regulation 23 of the SEBI LODR Regulations. The PCS verifies:

• Whether all related party transactions have been identified and disclosed
• Whether prior approval of the Audit Committee has been obtained
• Whether shareholders’ approval by ordinary/special resolution has been obtained where required
• Whether arm’s length pricing has been maintained
• Whether the transactions have been disclosed in the Board’s Report and financial statements

5. Form MR-3 — Structure & Content

The Secretarial Audit Report is issued in Form MR-3 as prescribed under Rule 9 of the Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014. The report follows a structured format:

5.1 Components of MR-3

1. Title and addressee — Addressed to the members of the company
2. Scope paragraph — Describing the scope of the audit, the records examined, and the period covered
3. Responsibility statement — Clarifying that the responsibility for maintaining records and compliance lies with the management; the PCS’s responsibility is to express an opinion based on the audit
4. Compliance reporting — Detailed reporting on compliance with:
   • The Companies Act, 2013 and the rules made thereunder
   • The Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 and rules/regulations
   • The Depositories Act, 1996 and regulations
   • FEMA, 1999 and rules/regulations (to the extent of FDI, ODI, ECB)
   • SEBI Regulations as applicable
   • Secretarial Standards SS-1 and SS-2
   • Other sector-specific laws
5. Board processes — Reporting on the adequacy of board processes, notice, agenda, minutes, and decision-making
6. Opinion paragraph — The PCS’s opinion on whether the company has complied with the provisions of the applicable Acts, Rules, Regulations, and Standards
7. Qualifications and observations — Reporting any non-compliance, deviations, or adverse remarks

5.2 Annexures to MR-3

The MR-3 report may be accompanied by annexures providing details of specific compliances, a list of laws examined, and any additional information the PCS considers material. The ICSI Guidance Note recommends annexing a detailed checklist of compliances verified.

6. Reporting — Qualifications & Observations

The quality and integrity of the secretarial audit report depend significantly on the PCS’s willingness to report qualifications and observations objectively. The types of reporting include:

• Unqualified report — The company has, in all material respects, complied with the applicable provisions
• Qualified report — The company has substantially complied, except for specific instances of non-compliance that are reported
• Adverse report — There are significant and pervasive instances of non-compliance that affect the company’s governance framework

6.1 Common Areas of Qualification

Based on ICSI publications and regulatory observations, common areas where qualifications appear in MR-3 reports include:

• Delay in filing annual returns or financial statements with the ROC
• Non-compliance with board composition requirements (independent directors, women directors)
• Non-maintenance of statutory registers
• Delayed or non-filing of forms with the ROC (e.g., DIR-12, MGT-14, ADT-1)
• Non-compliance with Secretarial Standards
• Related party transaction approvals not obtained in time
• Non-compliance with SEBI LODR provisions (for listed companies)

7. Consequences of Adverse Remarks in MR-3

Adverse observations or qualifications in the secretarial audit report can have serious repercussions:

• Board’s Report disclosure — The Board must comment on every qualification or observation in the MR-3 report in its Board’s Report (Section 134)
• Regulatory scrutiny — The ROC and MCA may initiate enquiry or investigation based on adverse remarks
• SEBI action — For listed companies, adverse observations relating to securities law compliance may trigger SEBI enforcement action
• Stock exchange queries — Stock exchanges may seek clarifications on adverse remarks from listed entities
• Impact on credit ratings & investor confidence — Persistent non-compliance adversely affects the company’s credibility with lenders, investors, and rating agencies
• Personal liability of directors & KMPs — Specific non-compliances may trigger personal penalties on directors and key managerial personnel under respective provisions

8. Attachment to Annual Return

Section 204(1) requires that the secretarial audit report in Form MR-3 shall be annexed to the Board’s Report. Additionally, under Section 92(2), the annual return filed in Form MGT-7 requires a certification from a PCS in Form MGT-8. These two requirements — the MR-3 secretarial audit report and the MGT-8 annual return certification — together provide a comprehensive governance assurance framework.

Companies must ensure that the MR-3 report is placed before the Board for discussion, the Board’s comments on any qualifications are included in the Board’s Report, and the report is made available to shareholders as part of the Annual Report. The secretarial compliance team coordinates between the company, the secretarial auditor, and the Board to ensure seamless integration of these reports.

9. ICSI Guidelines & Best Practices

The ICSI has issued comprehensive guidance notes and practice notes for conducting secretarial audits. Key best practices recommended include:

• Concurrent audit approach — Conducting the secretarial audit on a quarterly or half-yearly basis rather than only at the year-end, to enable timely identification and rectification of non-compliances
• Risk-based audit planning — Identifying high-risk areas based on the company’s industry, size, complexity, and past compliance history
• Working papers — Maintaining detailed working papers, checklists, and evidence files to support the audit opinion
• Management representation letter — Obtaining a management representation letter confirming the completeness and accuracy of information provided
• Reporting materiality — Applying the concept of materiality in determining which non-compliances to report as qualifications versus observations
• Communication with previous auditor — Where a new PCS is appointed, communicating with the outgoing auditor to understand pending compliances

10. Penalty for Non-Compliance with Section 204

While Section 204 does not prescribe a specific penalty for failure to obtain a secretarial audit, the consequences flow from related provisions:

• Section 204(4) — If the company or any of its officers is found guilty of non-compliance, the same is reported in the MR-3, triggering further action
• Section 134 — Failure to include the secretarial audit report in the Board’s Report constitutes non-compliance with Section 134, which attracts penalties under Section 134(8): a minimum fine of ₹50,000 (extendable to ₹25 lakh) for the company and imprisonment up to three years or a fine of ₹50,000 to ₹5 lakh (or both) for officers in default
• Section 447/448 — If the secretarial auditor’s report is falsified or a false statement is made, it may attract provisions relating to fraud (Section 447) or false statements (Section 448)
• SEBI penalties — For listed companies, failure to file the Annual Secretarial Compliance Report attracts fines and other enforcement actions from SEBI and stock exchanges

11. Secretarial Audit vs. Other Compliance Mechanisms

Frequently Asked Questions

Virtual Auditor | CA V. Viswanathan | IBBI Registered Valuer (Reg. No. IBBI/RV/03/2019/12333)
No. 7/5, Madley Road, T. Nagar, Chennai 600017
virtualauditor.in | +91-44-2434-0634